Here's a story about a team that was building a work management platform that would be used by peers across the land -- a VERY exciting adventure. The foundation of the platform, tracking information about their products, was complete, and the focus had shifted to tracking the processes that created the products. While there had always been a process in place, the specific details were hard to come by. This led to questions about product readiness, staffing needs, regional differences, and ways to improve the process.
Our team of adventurers went to work defining all the possible steps in that process, all the different ways those steps might come together into a product’s creation, the required paths based on product types, and the schedules by which the work needed to be done. They sought guidance from the craftspeople, the managers, and the senior leaders. They worked with technical experts to build the work tracking capabilities, automating the calculations and task assignments, all so that the organization could have the data to improve processes and increase efficiency. Many months after the team began, the system was ready, and it was rolled out with great fanfare.
Within weeks, it was clear that the process tracking capabilities were not being used as expected. When asked why they were not making use of the fantastic new capabilities, users were too busy doing the day-to-day work to take on additional steps (no matter how few) that didn’t make their work easier today.
Users had too much to do, too little time to do it all, and now one more thing taking time away from getting work done. The process just wasn’t going to happen. Within months, the capabilities were turned off, the data had not been collected, and the promise of process and efficiency improvements felt more like a dream.
Hey, I never said the story had a happy ending!
In that story, we weren’t able to improve workplace efficiency, but maybe we weren’t on the right path. After all, what exactly do we mean by “efficiency?" Most of us think “efficient equals fast,” and efficient people, processes, and tools often are fast. But the formal definition of efficient is “productive of desired effects,” with a follow-up note “capable of producing desired results with little or no waste.”
There is a lot to unpack there, so let’s break it down.
Much like the users in my story, I imagine you don’t have room for waste in your work. You have too much work to do and not enough hours in the day or people on the team or money to spend to get it all done. I’m pretty confident that you would love to do more and produce more desired effects. It’s easy to think of efficiency in the workplace as a focus for “management,” or “the board,” or (from my story) “the senior leaders,” but it can be a powerful tool for everyone in your organization.
Another (shorter) story for you: a team was responsible for working with physician’s offices and insurance companies to process approvals for care. There were forms to fill out, charts to share, cover sheets to print, and at the center of it all, faxes to send and receive. The process took time, focus, and expertise, and any increase in efficiency meant an increase in the number of patients served per day.
However, the team’s process had to follow the insurance companies’ rules, so their options were limited: they had to print out documents, pick them up off the printer, go to the fax machine, send the fax, and then walk back to their desks. But because the office had been set up years earlier (before the work processes were established), the printer and fax machine were at opposite ends of the long row of desks. It had always been that way, and everybody learned that process when they started. It was only when someone from another office visited and asked, “Why aren’t the printer and fax next to each other, in the middle of the row?” that a simple efficiency improvement was found.
As the printer/fax story shows, there are many ways to create efficiencies. Here are a few examples.
No matter how you produce ideas, the next step is to start a cycle of ongoing execution and evaluation.
Repeat this process regularly, including feedback from your “first steps” along with new opportunities to improve and you will discover more productive habits. Keep a continued focus on evaluating your progress against your desired effects and results which may change over time.
Go to Part 2 of our blog to read more about creating efficiency in the workplace.
KCare is a suite of innovative software solutions designed for behavioral health and human services organizations. Our industry-leading EHR, case management, and analytics products are designed to boost employee efficiency while improving client outcomes. For over 25 years, providers have trusted KCare to transform how they deliver care through our software solutions, including extendedReach, Exym, and Stabilify.
As a certified B Corporation, we operate our business in accordance with the highest standards of verified social and environmental performance, public transparency, and legal accountability. We are also part of the global Pledge 1% movement, donating 1% of our profits to the communities served by our customers.
Mike Alexander
Chief of Staff, KCare